Answer: Option (A) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct option: Earn positive profits in the long run.
All the industries that operates in a monopoly, oligopoly and monopolistic market conditions are generally having positive profits in the long run.
These industries can earn positive profits because there are high restrictions on the entry of the new firms. This is the case of monopoly and oligopoly. But in monopolistic competition, there are many firms in the market and the firms in this market condition can have a positive profits in the long run. There are comparatively less barriers on the entry of the new firms.
None because you can not do production with out having some kind of math or science
Answer:
How much may Adrian deduct?
This depends on whether the museum is private or not. If the museum belongs to a public charity or a university, then Adrian can deduct full fair market value = $35,000. Since Adrian's AGI is $80,000, she could donate up to $40,000 (half her AGI).
But if the museum is a private organization, then Adrian can deduct only her basis in the vase = $15,000
How would your answer to Part a change if, instead of displaying the vase, the museum sold the vase to an antique dealer?
Once you donate artwork, unless you strict prohibit the museum from selling it, then they can sell it and you cannot do anything about it. Some donors specific certain terms for their donations, e.g. artwork cannot be sold and it must be exhibited at least a certain amount of time, in certain places, etc. But if Adrian didn't include any clause on her donation, then whatever happens to the vase is up to the museum.
Currently, museums are less likely to accept restricted donations, unless of course the artwork is worth it.
Answer: Mutual mistake
Explanation:
A mutual mistake in a contract is a situation that arises when the parties in a contract make the same mistake in reference to a significant fact in the contract. i.e., they are mutually ignorant of a fact of the contract.
Had they both known about that mistake, they might not have gone into the contract so the contract is voidable in this scenario.
Both Walker and Sheerwood were mutually mistaken about the fact that Rose was pregnant when they went into the contract so this contract is voidable by this theory.