The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the three lost opportunities Harry experiences by deciding to go to his parents house. The term opportunity cost refers to <em>the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. </em>The potential gain Harry may have lost by choosing to go to his parents for dinner instead could be <em>relaxation while fishing, His house painting being finished, and time spent with his friends at the birthday party. </em>These all can be considers lost opportunity due to choosing an alternate opportunity, that being dinner at his parents.
The main way in which the railroads contributed to the end of the large buffalo herds was that "The railroad tracks were obstacles that the buffalo would not cross". It sounds silly, but the buffalo actually refused to cross the tracks for reasons that are still misunderstood.<span />
Answer:
States gained a large piece of western land know as the Mexican session cession.
Im not sure specifically what case you're referring to but lack of emotion in cases doesn't mean someone is guilty or unaffected. a lot of times a person is in shock or is trying to keep from being overly emotional.
