Answer:
4/6 of a pizza.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that:
Both pizzas are of the same size.
Jasmine cut her's into 12 slices.
Kelly cut her's into 6 slices, and ate 2 slices, then Kelly ate 2/6 of a pizza.
Jasmine ate X of a pizza, and we know that between them ate a total of 1 pizza.
This means that:
X of a pizza + 2/6 of a pizza = 1 pizza
X + 2/6 = 1
X = 1 - 2/6
X = 6/6 - 2/6 = 4/6
Jasmine ate 4/6 of a pizza, knowing that she cut her's into 12 slices, this would mean that she ate 8/12 of a pizza, or 8 slices.
<u>Explanation:</u>
a) First, note that the Type I error refers to a situation where the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. Hence, her null hypothesis would be H0: mean daily demand of her clothes in this region should be greater than or equal to 100.
The implication of Type I error in this case is that Mary <u>rejects</u> that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually true.
b) While, the Type II error, in this case, is a situation where Mary accepts the null hypothesis when it is actually false. That is, Mary <u>accepts</u> that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually false.
c) The Type I error would be important to Mary because it shows that she'll be having a greater demand (which = more sales) for her products despite erroneously thinking otherwise.
1/(x+5) because the (x-2) is canceled from both the numerator and denominator of the equation.
6.35 is the answer hope this helped you if you need more information or an explanation just put a comment or something on my profile
