At the time of our nation’s inception, the Founders believed that the open, free exchange of ideas was necessary for the survival of a representative democracy. As Benjamin Franklin proclaimed, “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” To protect this principle, the Founders established the freedoms of speech and the press in the First Amendment. In recalling their wisdom, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black wrote, “The Framers knew that free speech is the friend of change and revolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of tyranny.”
The First Amendment has come to symbolize the right of “a single minority of one” to express views that differ from those of the popular majority in the areas of speech, religion and expression. As a federal judge recognized, history has shown us that “pleasing speech is not the kind that needs protection.” According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the First Amendment has become the fortress for protecting the “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open” discussion of controversial and often unpopular issues in public places.
The First Amendment also includes the right to freely express one’s religion. It does so by guaranteeing every person the right to express any religious belief, or none at all, while at the same time prohibiting the government from favoring any particular religion over another. The government cannot dictate how we should act or what we should believe, especially when it comes to religion.
Explanation:
The original states, except Rhode Island, collectively appointed 70 individuals to the Constitutional Convention. A number of these individuals did not accept or could not attend, including Richard Henry Lee, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Samuel Adams, and John Hancock. In all, 55 delegates attended the Constitutional Convention sessions, but only 39 actually signed the Constitution. The delegates ranged in age from Jonathan Dayton, aged 26, to Benjamin Franklin, aged 81, who was so infirm that he had to be carried to sessions in a sedan chair.
Answer:
My opinion on western politics and culture should interact with a Islam is discussed below.
Explanation:
- Well If you ask me then I would like to say that Politics, whether it is western or eastern, should not interact with Islam or any other religion. because Politics and religion can not go hand in hand.
- But yes, the Culture of a different region can interact with any other religion or Islam. by an interacting culture of the different region whether it is western or eastern does not matter because it shares its beauty of culture such as brotherhood and gets enlightened by the beauty of other cultures.
- As we knew Islam is one of the religions which is famous for its sharia laws which is very strict they do not allow any outer interference in their religion so Western politics should not interact or interfere in their religion.
Answer:
Es bizantino
Explanation:
Puedes descubrirlo descubriendo que es el arte románico de la Europa medieval.
Answer:
No bro there isn't one country in history
