The US social welfare system differs markedly from those of western European democracies, a situation that is attributable in large part to America's group of:<u> cultural </u><u>emphasis on</u><u> individualism, </u><u>and federal system of government</u>.
Unlike the American government, European democracies redistribute income among their citizens on a much larger scale. Social and cultural programmes in Europe are more generous and benefit more people. The tax regimes in Europe are more progressive. European laws aimed at defending the underprivileged are more generous.
In the United States, the distribution of before-tax income is more skewed and has a greater volatility. There is no proof that taxes in Europe result in decreased deadweight losses. Additionally, income volatility seems to be less erratic in Europe than it is in the US. However, there's a probability that middle-class households in the US have a higher likelihood of advancing up the income scale, which may make the average voter less in favour of redistribution.
To learn more about European social democracies, refer
brainly.com/question/13824231
#SPJ4
Answer: Chocolate syrup
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
The Taj Mahal is a good sight and a restaurant is kochi, its a good restaurant look them up and start to read a little about them and see what you can find on them. also look at the menu, if there’s any nice or cool facts about the food.
Hope this helped
Northerners wanted Lincoln to free the slaves and, thereby, allow them to join the Union army.Some signed up as Union soldiers, while other free African Americans formed their own units and fought for the Union.In what ways did African American soldiers face more difficulties than white soldiers did?
Some white Union soldiers did not want the African Americans to fight with them. African American soldiers were paid less than white soldiers. And African American soldiers who were captured by the South were often executed or sold into slave labor. In total , it was to have more man power & beat the confederates .
