1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
3 years ago
13

Which events sparked world war 1? Check all that apply

History
2 answers:
Novay_Z [31]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand angered Austria.

Nationalism increased tensions in the Balkan peninsula.

Alliances caused a chain of events that pulled each country into war.</span>
dusya [7]3 years ago
3 0
The outbreak of world war 1 occurred on june 28,1941,when archduke franz <span> Ferdinand</span><span>, heir to the </span>Austro-Hungarian Empire<span>, was </span>shot<span> to </span>death<span> with his wife by the </span>Bosnian<span> Serb nationalist Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo.</span>
You might be interested in
What caused conflict between various groups of people in the west
Gelneren [198K]
<span>At the core of most intractable conflicts are deeply rooted divisions affecting parties' fundamental interests, needs and values. These include irreconcilable moral values, matters of justice and human rights, high-stakes distributional issues, unmet human needs, and issues of identity. Such conflicts tend to be protracted and have very damaging effects.IntroductionIntractable conflicts are ones that remain unresolved for long periods of time and then become stuck at a high level of intensity and destructiveness. They typically involve many parties and concern an intricate set of historical, religious, cultural, political, and economic issues.[1] These matters are central to human social existence and typically resist any attempts at resolution. In fact, parties often refuse to negotiate or compromise with respect to such issues. As a result, each side views the rigid position of the other as a threat to its very existence. They may develop a mutual fear of each other and a profound desire to inflict as much physical and psychological harm on each other as possible.[2] This sense of threat and hostility often pervades the everyday lives of the parties involved and overrides their ability to recognize any shared concerns they might have.<span>


Additional insights into the underlying causes of intractable conflicts are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.</span>As conflict escalates, any tangible issues may become embedded within a larger set of values, beliefs, identities, and cultures. Disputes about land, money, or other resources may take on increased symbolic significance.[3] Over the course of conflict, the original issues can even become irrelevant as new causes for conflict are generated by actions within the conflict itself. Those on opposing sides come to view each other as enemies and may resort to highly destructive means. Eventually, the parties become unable to separate different issues and may see no way out of the conflict other than through total victory or defeat.[4]Why do some conflicts become intractable? Many describe intractability in terms of the destructive relationship dynamics that govern the adversaries' interaction. For example, if one party resorts to inhumane treatment in waging conflict, this deepens antagonism and may lead the opposing side to seek revenge.[5] Likewise, when extremist political leaders appeal to ethno-nationalist ideology to arouse fear, this may increase support for the use of violence and contribute to intractability. Other factors that make some conflicts extremely difficult to resolve include the vast numbers of people involved, the large number of complex issues to be resolved, and a previous history of violent confrontation. But what are the underlying causes of these destructive conflict dynamics?What is common to all intractable conflicts is that they involve interests or values that the disputants regard as critical to their survival. These underlying causes include parties' moral values, identities, and fundamental human needs. Because conflicts grounded in these issues involve the basic molds for thought and action within given communities and culture, they are usually not resolvable by negotiation or compromise.[6] This is because the problem in question is one that cannot be resolved in a win-win way. If one value system is followed, another is threatened. If one nation controls a piece of land, another does not. If one group is dominant, another is subordinate.While sharing is possible in theory, contending sides usually regard compromise as a loss. This is especially true in societies where natural fear and hatred is so ingrained that opposing groups cannot imagine living with or working cooperatively with the other side. Instead, they are often willing to take whatever means necessary to ensure group survival and protect their way of life. Below are brief summaries of some of the central underlying causes of intractable conflict.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Why did European countries want to colonize places in Africa and Asia ?
Nadusha1986 [10]

A large reason for why European countries colonized places in Africa and Asia was for resources. Land also equated to power. Colonization often lead to a boost in economies.

Ex. As the Industrial Revolution came, machines needed more materials, like rubber. So instead of paying or trading for this commodity, countries often resorted to colonization.

5 0
3 years ago
HOW DID EGYPTIANS CHANGE THE ENVIROMENT IN THE RED LAND
zzz [600]

<span>The ancient Egyptians thought of Egypt as being divided into two types of land, the 'black land' and the 'red land'.The 'black land' was the fertile land on the banks of the Nile. The ancient Egyptians used this land for growing their crops. This was the only land in ancient Egypt that could be farmed because a layer of rich, black silt was deposited there every year after the Nile flooded.
The 'red land' was the barren desert that protected Egypt on two sides. These deserts separated ancient Egypt from neighboring countries and invading armies. They also provided the ancient Egyptians with a source for precious metals and semi-precious stones. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
1. After World War II the world was largely split between Western Democracies and Eastern
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
The United States and the USSR
6 0
3 years ago
List 2 trade goods from Brazil.
fenix001 [56]

Iron ore and Crude Petroleum.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement most accurately reflects the influence of African culture on American culture?
    9·1 answer
  • Deciding how to spend tax money is one of the main functions of
    11·1 answer
  • How did planters fill the need for large numbers of workers on sugar plantations? A. with captured Africans who were brought as
    8·1 answer
  • Who successfully negotiated the final terms of the treaty of guadalupe hidalgo
    10·2 answers
  • How did political machines hurt cities
    6·1 answer
  • The first State constitutions focused mainly on a. outlining the causes of the Revolution. b. limiting governmental power. c. es
    5·1 answer
  • Which is an accurate description of the Columbian exchange
    14·2 answers
  • Where did large cities form
    13·1 answer
  • Which three descriptions explain how people on the home front supported the war effort?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the timeline, which world monument was built first?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!