I believe that the speaker in the ballad of Robin Hood and the Scotsman is someone who knows the story.
<span>If you read the ballad, it can be concluded that Robin Hood is on his own. Friar Tuck was not with him. This ballad is also written in the past tense so Robin Hood could not have been the narrator. One can infer that the story was of the fight was either told to the narrator of this ballad by Robin Hood himself or the Scotsman. </span>
King was a minister criticized by clergymen, so he tried to justify his cause by paraphrasing the words of Thomas Aquinas, a notable interpreter of God's order on earth. He uses this allusion because he wants to underline the crucial difference between just and unjust law, that has been confirmed by one of the highest intellectual authorities in the fields of philosophy and religion. King provides a religious justification for the concept of nonviolent resistance.
During those months Rachel's mother looked after Aaron with something close to genuine fondness-- not pity, not obligation-- as though Aaron had become the son she always wanted.
This sentence flows very nicely and also makes sense. You can see that the punctuation is proper, the sentence makes sense, and the grammar is correct. With that in mind, that it the correct sentence structure.
Answer:
yes it is important
Explanation:
in the ancient times, the people depended on nature for everything. As they are depended on nature, they got more resources out of it, which lead to the modern life which is much more easy. (we should say thanks to them) From ancient till modern life, if we would not depend on nature, we would not be standing for sure . (as all ingredients of foods are starting with a natural ingredient)
I hope you like this answer and found it helpful
