Answer: Veronica is not correct
Explanation:
The AAA theorem, aka the AA theorem, only applies to similar triangles. We cannot use it to prove two triangles are congruent or not. We would need to know info about at least one pair of sides. So based on this diagram, we don't have enough information to know if triangle HAT is congruent to triangle PAM or not.
A similar example to this is to consider two equilateral triangles. Let's call them triangle A and triangle B. If equilateral triangle A has side lengths of 2, and has side lengths of 10, we can see that the triangles are not congruent. However, the triangles are similar because the corresponding angles equal one another. One triangle is a scaled copy of the other. This example is a counterexample as to why the AAA theorem is not a valid congruence theorem.
Answer:
No she is not correct
Step-by-step explanation:
She is not correct because “value of expressions” mean the result which for this it is 16-13 =3 and she is wrong. please mark me brainly! Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
D. Yes; the graph passes the vertical line test.
Step-by-step explanation:
→The vertical line test is when you hold something (like a pencil), straight up/vertically, and you move it from left-to-right to see if any two points repeat.
<u>→The correct answer is "D. Yes; the graph passes the vertical line test,"</u> because the x-values can't repeat, not the y-values, if the graph were to show a function. In this case, the graph passes the vertical line test.
Question 1132387: How many liters of a 10% solution should be mixed with 60L of 25% solution to get 15% solution? = one click in Excel = 120. ANSWER. 120 liters of the 10% solution.
