Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
64. 6138
66. 8.078125
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's take it one number at a time.
For number 64:










Sum = 6 + 12 + 24 + 48 + 96 + 192 + 384 + 768 + 1536 + 3072
Sum = 6138
For number 66:










Sum = 12 + -6 + 3 + -1.5 + 0.75 + -0.375 + 0.1875 + -0.0078125 + 0.046875 + -0.0234375
or to make things simpler:
Sum = 12 - 6 + 3 - 1.5 + 0.75 - 0.375 + 0.1875 - 0.0078125 + 0.046875 - 0.0234375
Sum = 8.078125
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
2000 smartphones and 1500 flip phones
4-3=1
1x500=500
500x4=2000
500x3=1500
Im pretty sure you are i have done this question before and im pretty sure thats what i put and i got it right. plus just go with your gut