I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
Answer:
which federalist papers??????¡!
I think it have to do with the rich and the poor the farmers or sum...
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>the two-factor theory </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the two-factor theory is associated with the emotion of an individual and it was introduced by </em><em>Jerome E. Singer and Stanley Schachter. </em><em>According to them, the emotion of an individual is based on the cognitive label and physiological arousal. </em>
<em>The two-factor theory</em><em> describes that when an individual feels emotion then specific physiological arousal tend to occur and therefore he or she utilizes the instant environmental factors to look for various emotional cues in order to label the given "physiological arousal".</em>
<em>As per the question, the two-factor theory describes the sequence of the given events.</em>
This Is What I Found, And I'm Not Taking Credit, Because I Did Not Come Up With This Answer: <span>They defined financial literacy as "the ability to use knowledge and skills to manage financial resources effectively for a lifetime of financial well-being."</span>