Answer:
The correct option is B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for amount after compound interest is
Where P is principal, r is rate of interest, n is number of times interest compounded in a period, t is number of years.
It is given that Felix took out an unsubsidized student loan of $40,000 at a 3.6% APR, compounded monthly. The amount after 33 month is
The amount after 33 month is $44156.1074. So, the new principle amount is $44156.1074.
The monthly payment of $44156.1074 for 20 years is
Where, P.V. is present value, r is rate of interest and n is number of times interest compounded.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Answer:
See below ~
Step-by-step explanation:
Anthony has graphed the inequality y ≤ -2x + 1.
For an inequality using a > or < sign, a <u>dotted line</u> has to be used instead of a solid line.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
It must be a trapezoid because a trapezoid has at least one set of parallel sides. Sides of equal length don't mean anything really unless we know hose sides are parallel. I will say sometimes I hear trapezoids ONLY have two parallel sides, while the other two are not, while in other places as long as two are parallel it is a trapezoid. It looks like for this question it is using the definition that at least two parallel sides makes it a trapezoid.
it can be an isosceles trapezoid since it is a type of trapezoid, same with right trapezoid. Basically any special kind of trapezoid
parallelogram because it can have two pairs of parallel lines and have thos parallel sides be equal. So this also means it can be all kinds of parallelograms.
Do you have a list to choose from? because most I pull up don't include right trapezoid at least.
This leaves kite as the only kind of quadrilateral to look at yet, and it specifies no parallel sides. bt your shape need at least one set of them, so it cannot be a kite.
<span>The
content of any course depends on where you take it--- even two courses
with the title "real analysis" at different schools can cover different
material (or the same material, but at different levels of depth).
But yeah, generally speaking, "real analysis" and "advanced calculus"
are synonyms. Schools never offer courses with *both* names, and
whichever one they do offer, it is probably a class that covers the
subject matter of calculus, but in a way that emphasizes the logical
structure of the material (in particular, precise definitions and
proofs) over just doing calculation.
My impression is that "advanced calculus" is an "older" name for this
topic, and that "real analysis" is a somewhat "newer" name for the same
topic. At least, most textbooks currently written in this area seem to
have titles with "real analysis" in them, and titles including the
phrase "advanced calculus" are less common. (There are a number of
popular books with "advanced calculus" in the title, but all of the ones
I've seen or used are reprints/updates of books originally written
decades ago.)
There have been similar shifts in other course names. What is mostly
called "complex analysis" now in course titles and textbooks, used to be
called "function theory" (sometimes "analytic function theory" or
"complex function theory"), or "complex variables". You still see some
courses and textbooks with "variables" in the title, but like "advanced
calculus", it seems to be on the way out, and not on the way in. The
trend seems to be toward "complex analysis." hope it helps
</span>
Just change feet into yards and multiply it
