Based on the economic and financial analysis, the main reason for considering <u>nonconstant growth</u> in dividends is to allow for "<u>Supernormal</u>" growth rates over "<u>some finite length of time</u>."
This is because, in nonconstant growth, the growth rate cannot surpass the mandatory return indefinitely.
However, there is the probability that it could do so for some number of years.
Also, it should be noted that in this situation, the value of the stock equates to the present value of all the future dividends.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>supernormal</u> and <u>some finite length of time</u>.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13223703
The answer is "trade barriers"
False, only shows transactions and amounts owed.
<span>Catherine will lose the case since she did not sustain any damages. However, there is a slim (and very unlikely) chance that T</span>om's will might agree to settle if Catherine claims damages in terms of emotional trauma.
