I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
Answer:
true (sorry about this I just need to get to 20 characters)
Explanation:
Explanation:
the two answers are handled the great number of people living in cities and the second answer is actively help people .
The correct answer is Siddhartha Gautama.
Gautama was born in modern day Nepal and was the son of a Chieftain. He eventually left the life of worldly possessions and went on a journey of discovery. His teachings would eventually become Buddhism and revolve around four noble truths and a path to peace and understanding.
