Rots your teeth
bad breathe,
unhealthy lungs/gums
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "d. all of the above." Sporting officials are typically responsible for starting and ending the competition, ensuring the game flows properly, <span>monitoring pregame activities.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "</span>c. respect and acceptance." A player with a positive attitude toward officials demonstrates <span>respect and acceptance.</span>
Answer:
c. Gerhard Lenski
Explanation:
Harold R. Kerbo tried to synthesize the functionalist and conflict perspectives. His analysis is based on the work of Gerhard Lenski .Harold R. Kerbo has been a professor of sociology at Cal Poly since 1977. Professor Kerbo has published several books and numerous articles on the subjects of social stratification, comparative societies, and economic development and world poverty. He has argued that stratification system are institutions that have evolved in order to reduce the conflict. There would be continuing conflict and aggression over the distribution of scarce resource without the system of stratification. When the question arises that who gets what and why, institutionalized inequality gives the answers.
Answer:
(A) Section Chief
Explanation:
According to my research on ICS staff members, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the person in the position known as Section Chief leads the General Staff. Section Chief's responsibilities are to Provide leadership, management and motivation to the assigned Section.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The advantage is like the article stated "Over time, J. T. guided Sudhir into a world that few outsiders have ever known,". To put into lamen's terms Sudhir got a inside peek at what most researches look away or far back from a cage of violence, prositution and gangs. The disadvantage can be a ethical, moral case that Sudhir violated. For example, by getting involved in the action of what he was studying, he messed with the research by becoming a recipient in the study and now there's question the validity. He doesn't need to justify because he was a bystander and besides what's the best course of action when two criminal gangs decide to fight each with guns, call the police? When it had to due with beatings although I more of a moral grey area for me based on the fact that I'm just a bistander and there's no guns involved. I think the opposition's main argument is that Sudhir was reckless and he's moral compass is secrewed up
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you