Some of the reforms that were put in place after the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire were:
- It was established that the companies would need to have sprinkler systems
- The safer working environment was established
- The powers of the fire commissioner was raised
- The fire prevention bureau was created as well
Yes I think that this reform helped to influence other reforms that were done in the nation.
<h3>What was the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire?</h3>
The triangle shirt waist factory fire was one that was known to have been very fatal in the United States. It occurred in the year 1911. The location was a sweatshop that was located in New York. This was the event that led to the clamoring for safer conditions for the people that worked in industries.
The fire incident was one that had to be very significant at the end of the day. It helped to establish regulations that were adopted all over the nation.
For instance people could now work in the factories that were better protected based on the laws of the nation.
Yes I would say that the event helped to influence other reforms in the United States.
Read more on the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire here:
brainly.com/question/714968
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Dust Bowl was a natural disaster that devastated the Midwest in the 1930s. It was the worst drought in North America in 1,000 years.1 Unsustainable farming practices worsened the drought’s effect, killing the crops that kept the soil in place. When winds blew, they raised enormous clouds of dust. It deposited mounds of dirt on everything, even covering houses. Dust suffocated livestock and caused pneumonia in children.2 At its worst, the storm blew dust to Washington, D.C.3
Key Takeaways
1. he Dust Bowl worsened the Great Depression by wreaking havoc on U.S. agriculture and livestock
2. Severe drought and bad farming procedures eroded the topsoil
3 The Great Plains could turn into a Dust Bowl again if the Ogallala Aquifer is drained dry
Answer:
Northeast. Since it is located in Massachusetts, and Massachusetts is located in the Northeastern part of the U.S.
Explanation:
hope this helps and is right :)
Answer:
It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.
It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise, It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).
Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.
At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.
