The epic of Gligamesh is the belief religious work of the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian cultures. It designates the heroic exploits of Gilgamesh, who may have been an actual, historical ruler of the city of Uruk at one time. Nevertheless, he became a mythical figure and principle figure in many stories, together with his chief companion Enkidu, who was half-man and half-bull. His epics also contain the story of the Babylonian Flood, as told to Gilgamesh by his ancestor Utnapishtum when Gilgamesh sought the secret of immorality from him. The big thing about Gilgamesh is that it is around human nature. Gilgamesh was the perfect model of civilization - a cultured prince that is almost divine. As a companion on his quest to divinity they found Enkidu, the natural man. The other side of human nature. By seducing Enkidu with a woman he was persuaded to become civilized and join with Gilgamesh as his brother. Enkidu perishes for challenging the power of the gods, and as a result Gilgamesh fails too. So you could reckon it as evil to challenge Gods, even though the slaying of the Bull of heaven would have been a good act in saving lives. This story is a likely precursor to the later Jewish story of a world-wide flood.
A hawk building its nest on an arm of a saguaro cactus is an example of commensalism
Yes city-states were is a way their own empires because they operated independently of one another, had separate economies and controlled the territory around them without the need for interference from third-parties.<span />
Answer:
First
Explanation:
A major question of the <u>first</u> party system was how much power should the national government exercise relative to that of the states?
The major question of the first party system which spanned from 1792-1824 and comprised of the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republican Party was how much power should the national government exercise relative to that of the states? While the Federalist party pushed for a more powerful national government, the Democratic-republican party was against this and instead canvassed for more state power.
Answer:
The "baby blues," something experienced by under half of the new mothers.
Explanation:
Baby blue symptoms hit forcefully within the 4 or 5 days after the birth of the baby. It depends on how the baby's birth occurs. It is a very noticeable cause to understand the cause of blue babies.
Symptoms:
- Crying without any apparent reason.
Causes: There is not known the cause of blue babies. It occurs may be due to hormone changes during birth and after giving birth.
