Answer:
Occupy movement could be explained through Durkheimn's Functionalism theory and Karl Marx's Conflict theory.
Studying collective behavior it could be stated that there is a collective conscience that condemns and punishes Occupy's actions and behaviors. Due to they could be considered deviant or criminal, offending this collective conscience, Durkheim would consider the Occupy movement as a "social fact". The movement would support Durkheim's theory as a social force because it is external to the individual.
This collective conscience can evolve to organic solidarity, and in the long run, there could be anomie, while the whole society no longer supports a collective consciousness in favor of what Wall Street stands for.
This change in collective conscience could be reflected in education, due to there would not be a single and unique collective conscience taught to all the students. This organic process derived from the division of labor is also shown on a full-range diversity of interests and, therefore, of interdependent students alienated from each other with singular perspectives about the Occupy movement.
Marx would support the last phenomenon as an example of a society splitting up into hostile classes facing each other. Alienation could be referred to as several students isolated from their society and competing among themselves. Another result of alienation is false consciousness, where beliefs, ideals or ideologies are not in the person's own best interest. These beliefs, ideas or ideologies are also present in an educational proposal that may not fit the individual's interests.
Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside of the convention center where the 1984 Republican National Convention was being held in Dallas, Texas. Johnson burned the flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan. He was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a venerated object,
Answer:
freed African American slaves in the Confederate states
Explanation:
<u>mark me brainliest pls! im not from the US so I had to do some research :)</u>
Answer:
A). Style involves word choice; tone involves the impression your message makes.
Explanation:
Style is demonstrated as the literary component that demonstrates the author's writing style which is reflected through employment of words, structure, syntax, rhetorical language in his/her text to create the desired effect like mood or atmosphere to elicit desired response while tone is demonstrated as the author's approach towards a particular subject matter that offers a framework/lenses to the audience to perceive the text in a contextual and comprehensive manner. Therefore, option A best elucidates the difference between the style and tone as <u>it correctly describes that 'style involves word-choice' that is associated with author's use of language and syntax while the 'tone makes the impression created by message' through the framework proposed by the author.</u> Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
