1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
3 years ago
10

Martha is looking into investing a portion of her recent bonus into the stock market. While researching different companies, she

discovers the following standard deviations of one year of daily stock closing prices. Handy Prosthetics: Standard deviation of stock prices =$1.05 El Lobo Malo Incorporated: Standard deviation of stock prices =$9.82 Based on the data and assuming these trends continue, which company would give Martha a stable long-term investment?
Business
1 answer:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Martha

Based on the data and assuming these trends continue,

Investment in Handy Prosthetics is preferred as it would give Martha a stable long-term investment.

Explanation:

a) Data:

                                                          Handy         El Lobo Malo

                                                       Prosthetics    Incorporated

Standard deviation of stock prices = $1.05            $9.82

b) The above standard deviations measure the spread of the stock prices over their daily stock closing prices in one year.  The Handy Prosthetics' stock does not fluctuate as much as the El Lobo Malo's stock.  This reduced fluctuation in prices makes it a more stable investment than El Lobo Malo's stock.  Therefore, Martha should prefer the Handy's stock to the El Lobo Malo's stock.

You might be interested in
Suppose that in 2007, Ford sold 500,000 Mustangs at an average price of $18,800 per car; in 2008, 600,000 Mustangs were sold at
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Actually suggests that there was an increase in the demands for Mustangs between 2007 and 2008

Explanation:

Two factors are important to consider in order to make the decision:

The first is the quantity of Mustangs sold

The second is the average price of Mustangs in each year

2007

500,000 Mustangs sold at an average price of $18,800

2008

600,000 Mustangs sold at an average price of $19,500

Implication

The quantity demanded of Mustangs in 2008 was so enormous that supply could not keep up with demand, hence, it created a gap between quantity demanded and quantity supplied. Once, there is a shortage of supply for a product the effect is that price of the product wil go up.

Therefore, the demand went up by 100,000 Mustangs in 2008 and since supply struggled to match this demand, the average price also went up by an aveage of $700

So, the statements show that the demand for Mustangs went up in 2008 and consumers were willing to pay more to get one.

3 0
3 years ago
Let's consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Bob, a bean farmer, and Rita, a rice farmer.
34kurt

Answer:

See below.

Explanation:

Lets first calculate inflation using the formula for Consumer Price Index

Inflation for a good = (Year 2 price - Year 1 price / Year 1 price) * 100

Using the above formula we can calculate inflation when Beans = $2 and Rice = $6.

Inflation for Beans = (2-1/1) * 100 = 100%

Inflation for Rice = (6-3/3) * 100 = 100%

Since each of them use rice and beans in equal proportions we assign them weights of 0.5 each,

Inflation Total = 0.5 * 100 + 0.5 * 100 = 100%

We assume Bob and Rita form a transnational relation and as such neither is worse off because the exchange rate between them remains the same,

Exchange rate before inflation = 3/1 = 3, Bob can buy 1 Rice by selling Rita 3 Beans.

Exchange rate after inflation = 6/2 = 3, so Bob can still buy 1 Rice by selling Rita 3 Beans.

B) For Prices 2 and 4 we use the above formulas,

Total Inflation = (2-1/1)*100*0.50 + (4-3/3)*100*0.50 = 66.66%

Bob is better off and Rita Worse off as the exchange rate for Bob has improved He can acquire 1 Rice for 4/2 = 2 Beans instead of 3 he needed before. Rita needs to sell him more to maintain her consumption but since they always consume same amount, she is worse off.

C) For Prices 2 and 1.5.

Total Inflation = (2-1/1)*100*0.50 + (1.5-3/3)*100*0.50 = (50-25) = 25%

Bob is now worse off and Rita better off as the Exchange rate change has favored Rita. Rita now only needs to sell 1 rice to obtain 2/1.5 = 1.3 units of Beans. Bob will have to sell more to maintain his initial consumption level.

D)

Bob and Rita are more concerned with their rate of exchange which is the change in real terms. As long as the changes are proportional and there are no third actors in the economy model, the 2 agents are not affected at all. What matters to them is their transnational rate and not inflation on the whole in this case.

Hope that helps.

5 0
3 years ago
American​ Exploration, Inc., a natural gas​ producer, is trying to decide whether to revise its target capital structure. Curren
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

a) 9.00 %

b) 7.80 %

c) yes the weight of the debt increases here is more risk in the investment as the debt payment are mandatory and failing to do so result in bankruptcy while the stock can wait to receive dividends if the income statement are good enough

d) 9.00  %

e) The increase in debt may lñead to an increase in return of the stockholders if they consider the stock riskier than before and will raise their return until the WACC equalize at the initial point beforethe trade-off occurs

Explanation:

a)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

Ke 0.12

Equity weight 0.5

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight = 0.5

WACC = 0.12(0.5) + 0.06(0.5)

WACC 9.00000%

c)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

Ke 0.12

Equity weight 0.3

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight 0.7

WACC = 0.12(0.3) + 0.06(0.7)

WACC 7.80000%

d)

WACC = K_e(\frac{E}{E+D}) + K_d(1-t)(\frac{D}{E+D})

<em>Ke 0.16</em>

Equity weight 0.3

Kd(1-t) = after tax cost of debt = 0.06

Debt Weight 0.7

WACC = 0.16(0.3) + 0.06(0.7)

WACC 9.00000%

3 0
3 years ago
When society produces the combination of goods and services on the ppf that it values the most highly, society has?
Brums [2.3K]
When society produces the combination of goods and services on the PPF that it values the most highly, society has Allocative efficiency. PPF is defined as the public provident fund, and Allocative efficiency<span> is the point in which the preference of the product consumption is balanced in production levels in an economy. This is specifically related to the benefit of a product or service being equivocal to the cost of making it, directly reflective of consumer preferences. 
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What is the advantage of Federal Loans over Private Loans? A. Federal Loans have fixed interest rates and Private Loans can have
iVinArrow [24]
The best answer for this question would be A. :) 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • International Imports (I2) pays an annual dividend rate of 10.40% on its preferred stock that currently returns 13.94% and has a
    10·1 answer
  • How can optimism help you as an entrepreneur? A. It helps you adapt to new challenges. B. It helps you accept advice from others
    9·2 answers
  • Which activity is involved in creating a traditional navajo weaving?
    13·1 answer
  • The term back door, as it refers to computer crime, is _____________.
    12·1 answer
  • Dennis took 12 index card and wrote the number 1 -12 on them what number collected the cards,shuffled them , and drew one card f
    9·2 answers
  • A current trend in management is to include ______ in the strategic planning process. Group of answer choices customers and supp
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT something that can be gleaned from a company's SWOT? How to improve a company's strategy by using
    7·1 answer
  • Henri wants customers in his specialty tobacco store to feel at home, as if they were in their personal smoking den. He uses lig
    14·1 answer
  • A company's income statement showed the following: net income, $134,000; depreciation expense, $30,000; and gain on sale of plan
    15·1 answer
  • The ideal measure of short-term receivables is the discounted value of the cash to be received in the future. Failure to follow
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!