Answer: Selective listening
Explanation:
Selective listening is defined as the phenomena in which filtration of information takes place towards the information that is being heard as per the person's ideas or opinion.
People tend to hear or pay attention to the information which they want and remove other facts that is not similar to listener's opinion.
According to the question, selective listening is displayed through the situation of Deena as she mostly avoid her parents communication but becomes attentive toward cloth of novel shopping talks because she in interested in it.
Traditional economic system based on the completely free market can get into a situation of a failure. This can be viewed through different perspectives:
1. Neoclassical economic point of view: Economic value is lost when the allocation of resources and production of goods is not efficient enough (or Pareto efficient). The main reason for market failure is percieved to be because of self-regulatory organizations, governments or other insititutions. This basically means that when government intervene in the market (with taxes, wage and price controls, subsidies) it can lead to the inefficient allocation of resources.
2. "Nature of the market" viewpoint: Economists see market as a place where individuals can benefit from trade with each other, but sometimes inefficiency can be caused by imperfect competition (or in other words monopolies, monopolistic competitions, oligopolies). Imperfect competition can be a result of a certain geographical condition which give certain individuals an advantage in the free market competition (that is called natural monopoly). Other reasons for inefficiency can be caused by entry barriers which occur when other companies cannot enter and compete in the market freely.
3. Marxist viewpoint: Some economists would argue that the system is placed to be inefficient in the first place. For those economists market failure means that market is failing to achieve its wider social goals, for example - reduce inequality. Marxian economists argue that the individual property rights are the problem in itself, and the resource allocation and production of goods should be done in other ways.
Answer:
The argument is a deductive, valid, strong argument.
Explanation:
Considering the following premises:
“Taliban take power in Afghanistan” (P)
“Taliban will eventually take power in all Central Asia” (M)
“Taliban will take over the rest of the world” (S)
The model is:
Premise 1: P = M
Premise 2: M = S
Conclusion: P = S.
This argument is a syllogism, and is a deductive, valid and strong argument.
Is deductive because this reasoning is known as transitive inference: there is a relation between P and S that we conclude from both relations P-M and M-S. Is valid because the premises are true, and the conclusion (or result) has to be true and valid. It is strong because is logically reasonable and there is no to disagreement on this structure.
Answer:
autism spectrum disorder.
Explanation:
Autism spectrum disorder: In abnormal psychology, the term autism spectrum disorder is described as a mental condition that is related to an individual's brain development that affects the way he or she socializes and perceives another person that causes different problems in his or her social communication and interaction. Autism spectrum disorder involves repetitive and limited behavioral-pattern.
In the question above, the given statement represents the autism spectrum disorder.
