Answer:
a)
To my view, the MD viewpoint is better. In companies the existing process is usually analyzed and the pain points identified whenever there is a need for change. The new system is simply a change to the existing system. The stakeholders' specific needs are not completely addressed. The MD calls for a collection of and analysis of demands from scratch to share its needs , requirements and inhibitions between the principal stakeholders. The CIO and their staff would be able to assess in the requirements review process what worked and what did not work well for the organization.
In assessing the current process, the CIO and his team will align their thinking process with the pain points and correct the existing system. They are not going to build the system in a fresh light. A new system that meets the needs of stakeholders can be developed. For everybody, this is a win-win situation. The point of view of MD is therefore more logical and related.
b)
In the particular case, the most logical and comprehensive system analysis method is:
Primary stakeholder requirements collection: Primary stakeholders using the system must be consulted on their specific requirements and needs. It is also necessary to consider the limitations identified by stakeholders.
Comprehension of existing system and pain points: the current system can be analysed based on requirements collection and pain points can be emphasized in the current system.
A new system that will win for everyone: the new system must primarily comply with the needs of the stakeholders.
Presentation and approval of the system blueprint to stakeholders
Development and implementation of the system: system development can be carried out by the agile method of sprinting.
Monitoring and control of the system: to check for performance deviations, the system implemented should be observed. In order to monitor deviations, specific intervention can be implemented.
Tax that you pay when making a profit from selling a house is an example of: <span>A. Capital Gains Tax
Every time you sell an asset that is not under investment category, The difference between your selling price with the initial cost when you buy that asset should be recorded as a Capital Gain.
In United states, you're inclined to pay around 28 % from the total capital gain as Capital Gain Tax</span>
Answer:
$1,100
Explanation:
EBIT = Sales - Costs - Depreciation
= $9,000 - $6,000 - $1,500
= $1,500
Net income = EBIT - Tax @ 40%
= $1,500 - $600
= $900
Operating cash flow = Net income + Depreciation
= $900 + $1,500
= $2,400
Free cash flows:
= Operating cash flow - Increase in working capital - Capital expenditure
= $2,400 - $500 - $800
= $1,100
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Signing a project charter rarther than project portfolio signal the trasition of a project from high level initiating phse into a more detailed project planning stage.
cheers.
Answer:
Bonds affect the U.S. economy by determining interest rates, which affect the amount of liquidity and determines how easy or difficult it is to buy things on credit or take out loans for cars, houses, or education
<h2>
Please mark me as brainliest</h2>
