All categories

2 years ago

If you deposit $100 of currency into a demand deposit at a bank, this action by itself

Business

1 answer:

Dahasolnce [82]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A) Does not change the money supply.

Explanation:

Demand deposits change the monetary base, because the monetary base equals currency plus demand deposits.

However, in itself, a demand deposit does not change the money supply. For the change in the money supply to occur, the bank must loan out some of the money in the deposit.

You might be interested in

A proposed new project has projected sales of $132,000, costs of $66,000, and depreciation of $13,500. The tax rate is 30%. Calc

Verizon [17]

Answer:Operating cash flow $ _50,250__

Yes, the answer is same in each case

Explanation:

a) EBIT + Depreciation - Tax

= ($132,000-$66,000-$13,500) + $13,500 - Tax

= $52,500 + $13,500-(30% x $52,500)

=$52,500 + $13,500-15,750

EBIT + Depreciation - Tax=$50,250

b)Top down OCF = EBIT - (EBIT x Tax) + Depreciation

Top down OCF = $52,500 - ($52,500 x 30%) + $13,500

Top down OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Top down OCF =$50,250

Tax shield OCF =(Sales - Cost)(1-t) + Depreciation (t)

Tax shield OCF = ($132,000-$66,000) (1-0.30) + ($13,500 x0.30)

Tax shield OCF =$66,000 x 0.7 + 4,050

Tax shield OCF = 46,200+ 4,050

Tax shield OCF = $50,250

Bottom Up OCF = Net Income + Dep

Bottom Up OCF =($132,000-$66,000-$13,500 ) - Tax ) + Dep

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500-(0.3 x $52,500 )+ $13,500

Bottom Up OCF = $52,500 -15,750 + $13,500

Bottom Up OCF =$50,250

2. Yes, the answer is same in each case

4 0

2 years ago

Two investment opportunities are as follows:________. Alt A Alt B First Cost 200 100 Uniform annual benefit 32 27 End of useful

Talja [164]

Answer:

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

Explanation:

Note: The data in the question are merged together. They are therefore sorted before answering the question as follows:

Alt A Alt B

First Cost 200 100

Uniform annual benefit 32 27

End of useful life salvage value 20 0

Useful life, in years 10 5

The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:

a. Calculation of NPV of Alt A

First Cost = 200

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (2)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 32

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (1) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 32 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^10) / 0.10) = 32 * 6.14456710570468 = 196.63

PV of Salvage value = FV / (1 + r)^n ..................... (2)

Where;

FV = End of useful life salvage value = 20

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The normal formula for calculating the present value (PV) is being used here to calculate the PV of Salvage value

Substitute the values into equation (2) to have:

PV of Salvage value = 20 / (1 + 0.10)^10 = 20 / 2.5937424601 = 7.71

Net present value (NPV) of Alt .A = PV of uniform annual benefit + PV of Salvage value - First cost = 196.63 + 7.71 - 200 = 4.34

b. Calculation of NPV of Alt B

First Cost = 100

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (3)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 27

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 5

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is also being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (3) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 27 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^5) / 0.10) = 27 * 3.79078676940845 = 102.35

NPV of Alt B = PV of uniform annual benefit - First cost = 102.35 – 100 = 2.35

c. Decision

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

6 0

2 years ago

Watts Corporation made a very large arithmetical error in the preparation of its year-end financial statements by improper place

daser333 [38]

Answer:

a prior period adjustment

Explanation:

A prior period adjustment -

It is the correction of the accounting error which took place in the past and was written in the prior year of financial statement , net of the income taxes , is known as a prior period adjustment .

It is the method to fix the previous problem of past during the reporting .

hence , the correct term fro the given statement is a prior period adjustment .

5 0

2 years ago

Elevators, Inc. does considerable business overseas for high-rise luxury hotels. To speed up the building permit process, it aut

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

No, Elevators, Inc. has not broken the law because payment was made in United States currency.

Explanation:

It operates a substantial business abroad for high-end luxury hotels. It authorized a project manager to "charge" a government official a charge of 500 for speeding up the building permit process. so

Under the law, it is illegal to bribe foreign officials to get business. But there is an exception to "facilitation payments", also known as grease payments made to speed up general government functions.
Flexible payments can be used to persuade government officials to perform work that is already being done. Although many have argued that such payments are important for their operations in some areas, such as Asia and Africa, the difference between facility payment and bribery remains unclear.

3 0

2 years ago

Leaders using the __________ style of leadership are only minimally involved in decision making and encourage group members to m

Alexeev081 [22]

<h2>Leaders using the "authoritarian leadership" are only minimally involved in decision making and encourage group members to make their own decisions.</h2>

Explanation:

Authoritarian leadership is also called Autocratic leadership.

They take little inputs from the group and has overall control and decision making power.

They do not accept advice from others

They do not trust others and try to rule everyone.

Most of the team members are not allowed to participate in any of the event and not even the immediate subordinate. Team members work like a robot.

It often outcomes only adverse effects.

8 0

2 years ago