Answer:
The increase in demand of the product with the higher price or decrease in demand for the other goods is because the substitution effect is outweighed by the income effect of price increase.
Explanation:
The above explanation in economics refers to Giffen Good. The idea behind this concept Giffen is that if you do not have money and there is an increase in the price of a fundamental product such as bread, it is still impossible to afford other alternatives, hence you will go ahead to buy bread or avoid buying any of the product. Hence, the demand for other product will also decrease in this case. This means that the demand for product with higher price or decrease in other substitute product is due to the fact that the income effect outweighs the substitution effect. Hence people do not have the money to even afford the alternative product.
<span>When a commercial item is procured by the government, the contractor will provide a </span>TDP or Technical Data Package<span> to the government</span> that documents the functional, performance, and physical characteristics of their product and will assist in the development of configuration management efforts.
Answer:
$256,284
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
First, Calculate the predetermined overhead rate per hour which equals to
= (Estimated manufacturing Overhead cost ÷ estimated machine hours)
= ($235,900 ÷ 20,800 hours)
= $11.34 per hour
So, the applied overhead or manufacturing overhead allocated equals to
= Predetermined overhead rate per hour × actual machine hours
= $11.34 per hour × 22,600 hours
= $256,284
Answer:
The current bid/ask spread for Berkshire Hathaway Class A shares is $935
Explanation:
The computation of the current bid/ask price is shown below:
The Current bid/ask price = Ask price - Bid price
= $263,810 - $262,875
= $935
The commission amount should be ignored in the computation part. Hence, it will not be considered as it is not relevant.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given case it is valid contract as there is time, promise, benefit and obligation to do thing. But verbal contracts are difficult to prove. Stan and Byron have a verbal contract which is a promise for 10 days and the contract has exchange of goods for $600. Offer is made by Byron but the acceptance is not yet given by Stan.
Here only the offer is made and it is not yet accepted by Byron. here Stan has revoked the offer through letter so the revoke has been communicated to the other party through letter. So in this case there is no breach of contract as the contract was clearly revoked by Stan through his letter.
