Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
<u>Answer:</u>
Fatima's statement that she intends to continue in her job in spite of her dissatisfaction makes you think that Fatima will likely experience "Cognitive Dissonance".
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cognitive dissonance is a psychological concept when an individual experiences non consistent thoughts and emotions (regardless of the environment). In this example, Fatima had been expected to quit her job (because she hated the manager).
In spite of that, she continued to work. That caused the cognitive dissonance in her behavior, as she changed her attitude. People correlate decisions and feelings many times, but due to some factors like patience, need of job etc, worked for an individual to be consistent and continue job.
The answer is: Level 1 – Full Activation
In this level, the state would give a notification to all states' supporting agencies that a start plan is about to be implemented. The Division of Emergency Management personnel would soon take control to organize these agencies and assign them with each of their own roles.
Glace has a glossy surface, and when frozen, appears like hard gelatin. I would have to say it is D. Thick.
Hope that helps!
Answer:
$300
Explanation:
Given that s a health insurance program with co-payments of $10 per doctor visit.
Thus,
amount paid by insurance in 1 visit = $10
Amount paid by insurance in 6 visit = $10*6 = $60
Total bill charged by the doctor in 6 visit = 360
Amount paid by the consumer = Total bill charged by the doctor in 6 visit - Amount paid by consumer in 6 visit = $360 - $60 = $300
Since , consumer is the third party payer he pays $300 out of total $360 bill charged by the doctor.
In fraction ,portion of bill paid by the third party payer = 300/360 = 5/6
Thus, 5/6 portion of bill is paid by third party payer.
