Answer:
1. Increasing
2. A. The elasticity of private saving with respect to the after-tax real interest rate
B. The response of private saving to changes in the government budget deficit
C. The elasticity of investment with respect to the interest rate
Explanation:
1. It is difficult to implement both of these policies at the same time because reducing taxes on private spending has the effect of <u><em>Increasing</em></u> the government budget deficit.
A Government budget deficit is acquired when the government spends more than it earns. The Government earns money from taxes and if it spends more than it receives in taxes, that will lead to a deficit. If taxes on Private spending are reduced, this will lead to less tax revenue for the government thereby increasing the Deficit.
2. All of the listed options are useful in determining which policy would be a more effective way to raise investment.
The elasticity of private saving with respect to the after-tax real interest rate refers to how much private saving changes in reaction to a change in the tax rates. This can enable one decide how much investment will be expected if the Government reduces or increases taxes.
The response of private saving to changes in the government budget deficit is also a useful factor to look at because private savings reduce when government deficits reduce.
Also how much does investment change by due to interest rates. This will be important to note in terms of Private Investment to see if it will be beneficial to use it over reducing the government budget deficit given a certain interest rate.
Answer:
The correct answer is 842.1 Pesos and 941.18 Pesos.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Price of Jeans = $80
So, if exchange rate is $0.095 = 1 pesos
Then pesos required to buy that jeans can be calculated as follows:
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.095
= 842.1 Pesos
And if 1 Pesos = $0.085, then
Pesos required = $80 ÷ $0.085
= 941.18 Pesos
Answer:
a.$4,704
Explanation:
Depreciation rate applicable for 2nd year as per MACRS 5 year class property = 32%
So, Irene cost recovery deduction = $21,000 * 32% * 70% = $4,704
Hence, the cost recovery deduction for Irene in 2020 is $4,704.
The biggest losers in that case were the tax payers.
Under the <span> institutional treasury management case, it involved the frauding of millions of dollars that is hidden from a certain investment account.
If not being fraud ,These millions of dollar should've resulted in about 40% tax rate that will be used by the government for the benefit of the taxpayers in the form of welfare or other infrastructures</span>
Answer:
Which of the following most accurately describes the change in average weekly earnings since 1980 Average weekly earnings have risen for college-educated workers only Which of the following workers is likely to earn the highest wage
