Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
The chicken tactic is a combination of a huge deceit or bluff about what you really want or need, and a threat to do something usually not very normal or rational. The whole idea is to try to force the other negotiating party to chicken out and surrender to your requests. Both a chicken tactic and a hardball tactic are designed to take advantage of the other party.
The problem with using a chicken tactic is what happens if the other side calls the bluff, will the threat be real or not, and what position will the other side hold. For example, an employer negotiating wage increases with a union, if the employer threats to close the factory and the other party tells him/her to go on and close it, what will be the result. This type of negotiating tactic can result in huge problems.
Answer:
1. $5.62
2. $15,174
Explanation:
1. The computation of the cost of one unit of product under variable costing is shown below:-
Total product cost = Direct material + Direct labor + Variable overhead
= $123,000 + $93,000 + $65,000
= $281,000
Unit product cost = Total product cost ÷ Produced units
= $281,000 ÷ $50,000
= $5.62
2. The computation of cost of ending inventory under variable costing is shown below:-
Unsold at end = Unit produced - Unit sold
= 50,000 - 47,300
= 2,700
Cost of ending inventory = Number of units sold × Unit product cost
= $5.62 × 2,700
= $15,174
Answer:
(a) The cost of goods sold on October 24
: $552
(b) The inventory on October 31: $532, (with 19 units)
Explanation:
The company uses a perpetual inventory system and using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for Item Zeta9, the answers are explaned with the help of the attached file:
The Cost of goods sold on October 24: $300+$252=$552
The formula of the future value of annuity ordinary is
Fv=pmt [(1+r/k)^(kn)-1)÷(r/k)]
Fv future value?
PMT monthly deposits 102
R interest rate 0.025
K compounded monthly 12
N time 65−35=30 years
Fv=102×(((1+0.025÷12)^(12
×30)−1)÷(0.025÷12))
=54,607.49
Hope it helps
