1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grandymaker [24]
3 years ago
5

PLS HELPPP FASTTT!!!! Which of the following is not consistent with the efficient market hypothesis?

Business
1 answer:
Morgarella [4.7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c. News has no effect on stock prices.

Explanation:

A foreign exchange market can be defined as a type of market where the currency of a country is converted to that of another country. For example, the conversion of the United States of America dollars into naira, rands, yen, pounds, euros, etc., at the foreign exchange market.

Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.

The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis which states that, asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market. Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.

According to the efficient market hypothesis, News has an effect on

the prices at which a stock is sold because it affects demand and supply.

You might be interested in
Which of these factors is an advantage to using cash?
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

B no fees or charges

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an example of fraud?
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

if it was never in stock its misleading and a fraud

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 58% debt, 6% preferred stock, and 36% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of
OLga [1]

Answer:

Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be higher by 0.64% if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 58% debt, 6% preferred stock, and 36% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of debt of 8.2%, and its cost of preferred stock is 9.3%. If Turnbull can raise all of its equity capital from retained earnings, its cost of common equity will be 12.4%. However, if it is necessary to raise new common equity, it will carry a cost of 14.2%. If its current tax rate is 40%, how much higher will Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) be if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings? (Note: Round your intermediate calculations to two decimal places.)

The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:

Step 1: Calculation of WACC when all of its equity capital is raised from retained earnings

This can be calculated using WACC formula as follows:

WACCR = (WS * CE) + (WP * CP) + (WD * CD * (1 - T)) ………………… (1)

Where;

WACCR = Weighted average cost of capital when all of its equity capital is raised from retained earnings = ?

WS = Weight of common equity = 36%, or 0.36

WP = Weight of preferred stock = 6%, or 0.06

WD = Weight of debt = 58%, or 0.58

CE = Cost of equity = 12.4%, or 0.124

CP = Cost of preferred stock = 9.3%, 0.093

CD = Before-tax cost of debt = 8.2%, or 0.082

T = Tax rate = 40%, or 0.40

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

WACCR = (0.36 * 0.124) + (0.06 * 0.093) + (0.58 * 0.082 * (1 - 0.40))

WACCR = 0.078756, or 7.8756%

Rounding to 2 decimal places, we have:

WACCR = 7.88%

Step 2: Calculation of WACC if it raises new common equity

This can also be calculated using WACC formula as follows:

WACCE = (WS * CE) + (WP * CP) + (WD * CD * (1 - T)) ………………… (2)

Where;

WACCE = Weighted average cost of capital if it raises new common equity = ?

WS = Weight of common equity = 36%, or 0.36

WP = Weight of preferred stock = 6%, or 0.06

WD = Weight of debt = 58%, or 0.58

CE = Cost of equity = 14.2%, or 0.142 (Note: This is the only thing that has changed compared to what we have in Step 1 above.)

CP = Cost of preferred stock = 9.3%, 0.093

CD = Before-tax cost of debt = 8.2%, or 0.082

T = Tax rate = 40%, or 0.40

Substituting the values into equation (2), we have:

WACCE = (0.36 * 0.142) + (0.06 * 0.093) + (0.58 * 0.082 * (1 - 0.40))

WACCE = 0.085236, or 8.5236%

Rounding to 2 decimal places, we have:

WACCE = 8.52%

Step 3: Caculation of how much higher will Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) be if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

This can be calculated as follows:

Percentage by which WACC is higher = WACCE - WACCR

Percentage by which WACC is higher = 8.52% - 7.88%

Percentage by which WACC is higher = 0.64%

Therefore, Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be higher by 0.64% if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

5 0
2 years ago
A company has an unbiased forecast for its demand. what does that mean?
andrezito [222]
Average of all forecast errors is 0 a company wants to use a regression analysis to forecasts the demand for the next quarter.
8 0
2 years ago
A) You observe the following exchange rates in the market.
blagie [28]

Answer: i. €0.11

ii. €1.08

Explanation:

i. If we get 1 krona for every $0.13 then how many krona do we get per dollar?

= 1/0.13

= 7.69 Krona is to $1

If $1 is 7.69 Krona and $1 is also €0.85 then that means that,

€ 0.85 = 7.69 Krona

So for each Krona exchanged, we get how many Euro,

= 0.85/7.69

= 0.11

For each Krona exchanged, we get €0.11

ii. Following the example of the first question,

if £1 is to $1.12 then how many pounds are a dollar?

= 1/1.12

= 0.89

£0.89 is equal to a dollar.

if €1 is to $1.04 then how many euros are a dollar?

= 1/1.04

= 0.96

€0.96 are equal to a dollar.

This means that,

£0.89 = €0.96

So for every British Pound exchanged we get how many Euros?

= 0.96/0.89

= 1.078

= €1.08

For every British pound Exchanged, we get €1.08

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Chester has obtained a productivity
    13·1 answer
  • Ross White's machine shop uses 2,500 brackets during the course of a year, and this usage is relatively constant throughout the
    5·1 answer
  • For each of the following transactions for the Sky Blue Corporation, prepare the adjusting journal entries required on October 3
    7·1 answer
  • A firm facing a price of $10 in a perfectly competitive market decides to produce 100 widgets. If its marginal cost of producing
    14·1 answer
  • Big Sky Sports sells hunting and fishing equipment and provides guided hunting and fishing trips. Big Sky Sports is owned and op
    14·1 answer
  • If 11 workers can produce a total of 54 units of a product and the 20 worker has a marginal product of six units what is the ave
    13·1 answer
  • Three weeks ago, you purchased a July 45 put option on RPJ stock at an option price of $3.20. The market price of RPJ stock thre
    9·1 answer
  • You should FOLLOW UP on items that: ______________, _________________, ________________.
    9·1 answer
  • On May 1, 2025, Hecala Mining entered into an agreement with the state of New Mexico to obtain the rights to operate a mineral m
    11·1 answer
  • How will an increase in labor productivity affect equilibrium in the labor market?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!