Greatest Common Factor: 2
Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
To find A' they used the rule of multiplication, which is:
the derivative of a product of two terms is the first term times the derivative of the second term plus the second term times the derivative of the first.
To find b' they just isolated b'
$79.56- $62.51= $17.05.
The stock increased $17.05 in one year~
Theoretically, the answer will be infinite.
Since one angle of 95 degrees means the other two angles must be acute. You can pick any two real numbers with the sum of 85.
