Answer:
The options are
a.sovereignty and expansion
b.imperialism
c.isolationism
d.cold war
The answer is a.sovereignty and expansion
Explanation:
Alaska was formerly part of the Russian colony. The United State bought Alaska for 7.2million dollars from the Russians in 1867.
During this period the United State was expanding and Hawaii was also annexed to them.
These actions represented a sovereignty and expansion of the United State.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I just know because I searched it up on google
Based on the rate charged to Plessy, we can determine that this loan is <u>a. usurious. </u>
When a loan is usurious:
- It means that the interest charged is exorbitant
- It is considered immoral
- It can be considered illegal if it is above the rate required by law for such loans.
The interest charged is 5% higher than what the law allows here which means that the rate must be quite high.
We can therefore conclude that this loan is usurious and action can be taken against it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/6668760. </em>
Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
I strongly believe is freedom for the answer
