Answer:
Roman Law, Cannon Law, Codification
Explanation:
I don't really know if that's right, but I think it's true.
When we talk about "widening the net" in terms of the correction system, this refers to the idea that, the more offenders that are in the community, the more the correction system can control and surveil the community.
However, increasing the number of offenders who are supervised by corrections officers might have some negative unintended consequences. For example, such an approach could increase the number of offenders who are found to be violating the terms of their parole or committing crimes. Another consequence would be the loss of resources, as higher levels of resources would be needed to carry this out.
Answer:
Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.
Explanation:
I personally disagree with the Electoral College. It was a system that worked 200 years ago. The system now just doesn’t work because we have all these things like mail in voting, claimed election fraud, etc. Not only that but the electoral college could have a bias against a candidate. If you look at Hilary Clinton for example. She ran for President in 2016 but ended up losing the Electoral College vote but won the popular vote. Now she is an electoral college member which obviously, she wouldn’t vote for trump. The only reason the Electoral College is because the original framers said that the president and Vice President should be decided by a set group of people. Which today, is the Electoral College. Hope this helps!
Answer:
I'm not sure but maybe a situation where there was a person who killed a burglar, stealing from their house.