1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tanzania [10]
3 years ago
14

PLEASE HELP

Law
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
5 0
No
republican super majority
lobbying
many times people in government vote for something because their allies are voting for it/they feel pressured
You might be interested in
13. On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
irga5000 [103]
It’s A because of the law
7 0
3 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
2 years ago
Which principle was included in most state constitutions? parliamentary structure; the early state constitutions all copied Penn
alekssr [168]

Answer:

separation of powers.

Explanation:

In the US, each state has its own constitution. The constitution represents the set of all laws that must be followed in that territory. Although all US states are subject to federal law, each is free to create their own legislation.

In order to protect citizens from states of tyranny, or abuse of power by rulers, the principles that were included in most state constitutions were the separation of powers.

4 0
3 years ago
When you are driving a motor home and are following another vehicle, you
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

B. Use two times the following distance that

you use when driving your car.

5 0
3 years ago
Explain the sources of each type of law and provide examples of each:
Anna [14]

Answer:

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

Explanation:

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

80 inches^2

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. Any pursuit driving should be done with the aim of minimizing the risk to:
    7·2 answers
  • What is the main way political parties are able to shape public policy?
    15·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • There are many examples of police misconduct. Explain at least two reasons that could cause an honest officer to violate the law
    6·1 answer
  • What is a rebuttal?
    5·2 answers
  • Rihanna enters into a contract with Britney to provide 100 roses for a dinner party. Britney fails to deliver the roses. Rihanna
    9·2 answers
  • If motor skills are distorted by drugs or alcohol, this may result in ...
    7·1 answer
  • In AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
    5·1 answer
  • The appropriate form or format used to report an appraisal is MOST dependent upon?
    14·1 answer
  • A person charged with a crime has a constitutional right to: A. receive a trial by jury . B. demand a trial in federal court . C
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!