1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Len [333]
2 years ago
15

The house agreed to the compromise as soon as the senate approved it

Law
1 answer:
erica [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

~L~

You might be interested in
Question 6 of 10
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

d is the anjjj

swerExdplanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
_____________________ is a legal concept that means people can be held responsible for their actions even when they didn’t inten
natulia [17]

Answer: Strict liability

Explanation:

 Strict liability basically responsible for holding the someone liable for the damages and loss without any mistake. Basically , it is the legal concept which the person are responsible for their consequences and action.

It is also known as absolute liability that basically caused by the damages and the defective products. The strict liability are basically reorganize as criminal law and possession crime is one of the example of the strict liability.  

7 0
2 years ago
Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Cloward and ohlin argued that some people have greater access to illegal opportunities than other people. True or false?
alexira [117]
True in some cases, however law enforcement personnel will punish anyone, under certain circumstances it is much easier to do illegal activities, such as if someone were to have a dad as a cop they can get away without a speeding ticket etc.
6 0
3 years ago
Private prisons are more economically efficient than government-run facilities.
muminat
False is your answer
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is the number of democrats and republicans the same in Senate and House?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the second continental congress, when drafting the articles of confederation, create a weak central government?
    6·2 answers
  • Think about the unit material for a minute. How does cybercrime compare to white collar crime?
    9·1 answer
  • If you cannot see clearly around your car 100 ft in all directions as you approach an intersection, you should:
    9·2 answers
  • Someone please help me with this question!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the Bill of Rights referred to as the anti-Federalist legacy?The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in response
    6·2 answers
  • Which police function focuses on handling citizen disputes through mediation, referral
    15·1 answer
  • In the dual court system, the three basic tiers include trial courts, ________, and supreme courts.g
    9·1 answer
  • The establishment clause of the first amendment has often been interpreted to mean
    11·1 answer
  • If I am under 18 years of age am I prohibited from using my cellphone while driving
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!