Their culture was influenced by Greek traders, and by the Greek colonists of southern Italy
Answer:
Answer.Although steamboat transportation and railroad construction began in Texas before the Civil War, river steamer and rail transportation were generally postwar developments. After the war the traditional cotton plantation system continued, but with tenant farmers in place of slaves...
Explanation:
It's Correct Answer...
The treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo gave the United States some territory <u>south of the Rio Grande</u>
Explanation:
The treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo signed between the United States and Mexico on February 2, 1848, led to a territorial exchange of lands between the two parties.
Mexico had to surrender Texas state and accept the Rio Grande as the boundary of Texas state. This led to half the size of Mexico and increase the size of the United States with a bountiful of rich natural resources.
This increase of vast land tract to the United States included many regions from California to Kansas for which the US paid $15 million.
The Rio Grande is part of the territorial boundary shared by the United States and Mexico.
<u><em>Laws keep Countries Stable.</em></u>
Answer: Laws protect our general safety, and ensure our rights as citizens against abuses by other people, by organizations, and by the government itself.
The Purposes of Law. In a society such as the United States, the law informs everyday life in a wide variety of ways and is reflected in numerous branches of law. ...<em> The law serves many purposes. Four principal ones are establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberties and rights. </em>
<em />
No country can maintain a rule of law society if its people do not respect the laws. <em>Everyone must make a commitment to respect laws, legal authorities, legal signage and signals, and courts</em>. ... The rule of law functions because most of us agree that it is important to follow laws every day.
Sorry I couldn't answer this earlier. I was busy answering other questions like these.
The correct answer is B.
Clinton v. New York was a decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1998, which stated that the line-item veto violated the Presentment Clause and, therefore, the US Constitution.
The line-item veto had been introduced by the Line Item Veto Act in 1996 and it allowed the chief of the executive power, the President, to veto fragments or provisions of a bill without vetoing the entire bill. In opposition, the Presentment Clause describes the procedure through which bills originating in Congress, become federal US law. Such procedures only contemplate the president's power or rejecting an entire bill.