Answer: I think it would be C i'm not sure why don't you try that and let me know okay
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Partnership
Explanation:
Based on the description of this scenario it can be said that the best option for Mary would be a Partnership. This means that she will share ownership and profit with those involved but at the same time will also share the liabilities. This will make sure that the other tattoo artists will do their utmost best since they will have to deal with the consequences as well if they do not. Which in term protects Mary.
He is planning.
Organizing would be after everything is thought of and bought, and now just fixing everything the way they should be. Controlling and leading are both far after the admin would be thinking of things like this.
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer: 1.356345
Explanation:
Based on the scenario and information provided in the question, the 90-day forward rate will be calculated as:
= Spot Rate × (1 + Germany Interest Rate) / (1 + United States Interest Rate)
= 1.35 × (1 + 6.5%) / (1 + 6%)
= 1.35 × (1 + 0.065) / (1 + 0.06)
= 1.35 × 1.065/1.06
= 1.35 × 1.0047
= 1.356345
