Answer:
y=2e^(−x)cosx−e^(−x)sinx
Satisfies the equation
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
y=2e^(−x)cosx−e^(−x)sinx
y = e^(-x)[2cosx - sinx]
Find y' and y" using product law
y' = -e^(-x)[2cosx - sinx] + e^(-x)[-2sinx - cosx]
y' = -e^(-x)[2cosx - sinx + 2sinx + cosx]
y' = -e^(-x)[3cosx + sinx]
y" = e^(-x)[3cosx + sinx] - e^(-x)[-3sinx + cosx]
y" = e^(-x)[3cosx - cosx + sinx + 3sinx]
y" = e^(-x)[2cosx + 4sinx]
y" + 2y' + 2y
e^(-x)[2cosx + 4sinx] - 2e^(-x)[3cosx + sinx] +2e^(-x)[2cosx - sinx]
e^(-x)[4sinx - 2sinx - 2sinx + 2cosx - 6 cosx + 4cosx]
= e^(-x) × 0
= 0
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
when you multiply $1.59 by 5 you get $7.95
when you multiply $1.87 by 2 you get $4.74
so when you subtract them you get $3.21
Answer:
96
Step-by-step explanation:
number of bikes produced per hour
<em>x * 12 = y</em>
- 1 * 12 = 12
- 7 * 12 = 84
- 9 * 12 = 108
- <em><u>8 * 12 = 96</u></em>
They are indentical because the only thing that switched was the addition sign, and subtraction sign. If you look closely.
