Answer:
Nothing at all. Thanks for asking, though. Have a great day!
The argument by supporters of the Fugitive Slave Law that the Constitution and laws passed by Congress should be obeyed is valid.
<h3>What was the Fugitive Slave Law?</h3>
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was the Congress act that required that runaway slaves should be returned to their owners by force.
The Fugitive Slave Law was part of the Douglas Compromise of 1850. Through the act, the federal government became responsible for:
- Finding
- Returning
- Trying
- Fining escaped slaves.
Since Congress is responsible for making laws and amending the Constitution of the United States, any laws that it passes must be obeyed.
However, Congress should never be engaged in passing unjust or discriminating laws, especially the likes of the Fugitive Slave Law.
Thus, the argument by supporters of the Fugitive Slave Law that the Constitution and laws passed by Congress should be obeyed is valid.
Learn more about the powers of Congress at brainly.com/question/14336660
<em>B. It had cotton it could sell to Europe.</em>
Explanation:
One of the advantages that the South had over the North at the start of the Civil War was their ability to sell cotton to Europe.
Cotton was a very valuable item during this time. The South was providing a lot of it and Europe would buy it for a lot of money. Cotton, tobacco, indigo, and other cash crops were the Southern states' primary source of income.
The South did not have a better transportation system and they did not have an economy based industry. The North was industrialized and got its income from factories. The South was still based on agriculture, as they had better soil and a better climate to farm. This was why the South was adamant about keeping slavery, they needed the labor work to continue getting income.
The shrinking of the economy lowered the profit after selling goods and it wouldn't make sense not to lay off workers
Answer:
The differences between The United States under Truman and Russia under Stalin were that the U.S. sought for Free market self-sustained economies to develop While Russi looked for economies based on the exploitation of resources at its max to attempt to balance society in a communist system in which the government had the power to distribute the wealth.
Explanation:
The vision Truman and the United States had for Europe, was of a system that could rely on free markets, open economies and scenarios of development with international cooperation agreements to incentive trade. on the other hand, Stalin and Russia had a vision for Europe in which it relied on a fight against the wealthy to balance society and use all the resources available to allow it. The U.S. in the first place wanted Germany as a producer. While Russia wanted it separated and in a struggle to prevent future threats against them. Both ought to maintain influence over the European countries and did their best to assure it. However, only Russia maintained an ideologically manipulative perspective to abuse from the well-intentioned countries that sought to balance society.
