Answer:
-22/3 =x
Step-by-step explanation:
(4x-4) /(x+4) = 10
Multiply each side by (x+4)
(4x-4) /(x+4) * (x+4) = 10 * (x+4)
(4x-4) = 10 * (x+4)
Distribute
4x-4 = 10x+40
Subtract 4x from each side
4x-4-4x = 10-4x+40
-4 = 6x+40
subtract 40 from each side
-4 -40 = 6x+40-40
-44 = 6x
Divide each side by 6
-44/6 = -6x/6
-22/3 =x
The answer is B, and here's why. Set up a table for "there" and "back" and use the distance = rate * time formula, like this:
d r t
there d 450 t
back d 400 1-t
Let me explain this table to you. The distance is d, we don't know what it is, that's what we are actually looking for. We only know that if we go somewhere from point A to point B, then back again to point A, the distance there is the same as the distance back. Hence, the d in both spaces. There he flew 450 mph, back he flew 400 mph. If the total distance was 1 hour, he flew an unknown time there and one hour minus that unknown time back. For example, if he flew for 20 minutes there, one hour minus 20 minutes means that he flew 60 minutes - 20 minutes = 40 minutes back. See? Now, because the distance there = the distance back, we can set the rt in both equal to each other. If d = rt there and d = rt back and the d's are the same, then we can set the rt's equal to each other. 450t = 400(1-t) and
450t = 400 - 400t and 850t = 400. Solve for t to get t = .47058. Now, t is time, not the distance and we are looking for distance. So multiply that t value by the rate (cuz d = r*t) to get that the distance one way is
d = 450(.470580 and d = 211. 76 or, rounded like you need, 212.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = (x - 4)(x + 2)
f(x) = x^2 + 2x - 4x - 8
f(x) = x^2 - 2x - 8
Answer: 389
Step-by-step explanation: well if there is lollipops for $2.50 each and they sold thrice as many lollipops then they have sold 7.5 of the lollipops and if you sell thrice of the cookies then that will be 31.5 and if you add 7.5 and 31.5 that will be 39 so the real answer is 389.
Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )