This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Alan used to follow a libertarian leadership style. He recently decided to become stricter toward productivity targets as a result of the fluctuations in the market. He does this in order to make his team more task oriented. This is an example of _____.
a. leaders using debasement techniques
b. situations shaping how leaders behave
c. leaders using techniques of ingratiation
d. dividing the group into in-group and out-group
Answer:
The correct answer is letter b. situations shaping how leaders behave.
Explanation:
The situation described in the question is an example of how situations can affect leaders' behaviors. According to contingency theorists, even though our personal characteristics are strong, the forces in a situation are three times as strong, therefore shaping a leader's behavior. As we can see, Alan is more of a libertarian leader, but his approach had to change due to fluctuations in the market.
Planning, zoning, and open-space preservation are examples of hazard mitigation actions in the "<span>c. natural resources protection" </span>category, since all of these measures have to to with protecting things that are already there, not adding new resources.
The Constitution leaves a lot of space for personal interpretation, which means different people can view the document in different ways and to different degrees. For example, one may say, something that isn't stated in the Constitution means the government shouldn't do it. This is called strict interpretation of the Constitution. However, someone else may say that there wasn't anything in the Constitution prohibiting it. These differences have played a role in the formation of political parties. Hope this helps! :)
<span>he Monroe Doctrine was a United States policy of opposing European colonialism in the Americas beginning in 1823. It stated that further efforts by European nations to take control of any independent state in North or South America would be viewed as "the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States." At the same time, the doctrine noted that the U.S. would recognize and not interfere with existing European colonies nor meddle in the internal concerns of European countries. The Doctrine was issued on December 2, 1823 at a time when nearly all Latin American colonies of Spain and Portugal had achieved, or were at the point of gaining, independence from the Portuguese and Spanish Empires.
</span>
