1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
3 years ago
5

Who were the primary leaders in the New England colonies?

History
2 answers:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D took the test

Explanation:

Flura [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the last one d Roger Williams, John Winthrop, and William Bradford

You might be interested in
With better economic news lately, demand for houses has gone up what effect would this have on a demand curve
sweet [91]

Answer:

A. a shift to the left

Explanation:

Rather, the National Association of Realtors expects rates to average 3.1% and the Mortgage Bankers Association says mortgage rates will average 3.3% in 2021. These rate estimates are both up from the 3.0% mortgage rate average in 2020 but lower than 2019 average rates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone please help me with this? <3
nlexa [21]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

arts philosophy and culture where reborn during the rennisance and renisance means rebirth

7 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
In the 1850's ,seekers of gold traveled west by what two methods of transporrt
Virty [35]
Well rather than ride slaves horse and carriage were popular with slaves as attendances in case there was a need and of course trains too
3 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLEASE!!!
harkovskaia [24]

Answer: True

Explation , this is true. This is named as a speech that incites (makes people commit) imminent lawless action - that is, speech that incites violence or breaking the law. Another exceptions to the rule of free speech are obscenity,- which is a quite controversial exception

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who said that men had the right to life, liberty and property?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between a lord and a serf?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the map of modern Europe differ from the map of Europe in the 17th century?
    10·2 answers
  • The secret service falls under the control of the
    8·1 answer
  • How has monarchy change over time I mean it’s still the same concept but it’s not rule the same way. How is old monarchy differe
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how George Curry helped to reshape conservation in New Mexico.
    9·1 answer
  • Choose the answer that puts the following events in the correct order from first to last.
    12·2 answers
  • Short writing assignment, please help asap.
    8·1 answer
  • What was the benefit of Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) limiting the production of crops and livestock?
    9·1 answer
  • In what way did Galileo try to embarrass the Pope?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!