All categories

3 years ago

Help Will give crown!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Vlada [557]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

the answer is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

if u look 2.5 gives u 3 so 5 would give u 6

You might be interested in

How does one solve this?

Tresset [83]

The answer is a. $x\sqrt{7}$

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If u answer this question i will get u famous on brainly

grigory [225]

Answer:

it a

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The cost of attending an amusement park is $10 for children and $20 for adults. On a particular day, the attendance at the amuse

Lapatulllka [165]

Using a system of equations, it is found that 10,000 children attended the park that day.

<h3>What is a system of equations?</h3>

A system of equations is when two or more variables are related, and equations are built to find the values of each variable.

In this problem, the variables are:

Variable c: Number of children in the park.

Variable a: Number of adults in the park.

The attendance at the amusement park is 30,000 attendees, hence:

c + a = 30,000, which is the first equation in matrix form.

Then:

a = 30,000 - c

The cost of attending an amusement park is $10 for children and $20 for adults. The total money earned by the park is $500,000, hence:

10c + 20a = 500,000, which is the second equation in matrix form.

Since a = 30,000 - c, we replace:

10c + 20a = 500,000

10c + 20(30000 - c) = 500,000

10c = 100,000

c = 10,000.

More can be learned about a system of equations at brainly.com/question/24342899

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

Explain how you would solve 5x - 3 = 9. (there should be a minimum of 2<br> complete sentences). *

SpyIntel [72]

Haha, you first start off with adding 3 to both sides, cancelling the -3, and adding it to 9. you end up with 5x=12, in which you divide both sides by 5. you get 2 and 2/5 or 12/5! hope that helps :)

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which series of transformations will not map figure H onto itself

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a square with vertices at points (2,1), (1,2), (2,3) and (3,2).

Consider option A.

1st transformation $(x+0,y-2)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,-1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (1,0);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,0).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = 1 has the rule (x,2-y). So,

$(2,-1)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(1,0)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,0)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option B.

1st transformation $(x+2,y-0)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (4,1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (5,2).$

2nd transformation = reflection over x = 3 has the rule (6-x,y). So,

$(4,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,3)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,2)\rightarrow (1,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option C.

1st transformation $(x+3,y+3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (5,4);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (4,5);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (5,6);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (6,5).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 7 will map vertices into points

$(5,4)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,5)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,6)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(6,5)\rightarrow (2,1)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option D.

1st transformation $(x-3,y-3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (-1,-2);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (-2,-1);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (-1,0);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (0,-1).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 2 will map vertices into points

$(-1,-2)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(-2,-1)\rightarrow (3,4);$
$(-1,0)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(0,-1)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are not the vertices of the initial square.

5 0

3 years ago