Answer:
It is highly recommended as it creates a community stakeholder effect on the locals. They feel loved by the company and information/data on buy behavior can be collected...
Explanation:
I hope this helps you!!
1.Federal district courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They only have subject-matter jurisdiction if a claim arises under federal law, or if no plaintiff shares a state of citizenship with any defendant and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (see diversity jurisdiction). Richard thinks that Vincent has violated federal racketeering law, and wants to file a civil suit. Richard and Vincent are both citizens of New York, but the case can still be tried in federal district court because the claim arises under federal law. Alternatively, the case may be tried in state court because no law gives federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over this type of claim.
2. State trial courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over all cases except those which must be heard exclusively in other courts. Paul files a tort case against Dennis in a state trial court. There is no law which gives any court exclusive jurisdiction to hear this type of case. Therefore, the state trial court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case
Answer:
D) The distance between a person’s current developmental level and their potential development level with assistance from a more capable ally
Explanation:
This concept was given by a Soviet psychologist named Lev Vygotsky. A child always followed elders in family and develop the ability to do a task without any help. It is the distance between actual development indicated by independent problem solving and potential development under the guidance of capable peers. Now it has been modified, expanded and changed in new concepts. Scaffolding is another concept that is closely related to ZPD concepts. Thus proximal is referred to as those skills which are close to the learner and can mastery over them.
Answer:
Dionysus.
Explanation: Dionysus was the god of wine, fertility, and revelry.
Hope this helps.
The answer is "<span>explicit or implicit coercion".
</span>
Explicit and Implicit Coercion is where speed is fundamental and to be utilized just as final resort. Supervisors can explicitly or implicitly force representatives into tolerating change by clarifying that opposing to change can prompt losing occupations, terminating, exchanging or not advancing workers.
