Example 1<span>
<span><span>verbose explicit high3 <span>plus </span>4 <span>cross </span>2 <span>minus </span><span>minus </span>2 <span>equals </span>3 <span>plus </span>8 <span>plus </span>2 <span>equals </span>1 3</span><span>verbose explicit high semantics3 <span>plus </span>4 <span>times </span>2 <span>minus </span><span>negative </span>2 <span>equals </span>3 <span>plus </span>8 <span>plus </span>2 <span>equals </span>13</span><span>verbose explicit high semantics high3 <span>plus </span>4 <span>times </span>2 <span>minus </span><span>negative </span>2 <span>equals </span>3 <span>plus </span>8 <span>plus </span>2 <span>equals </span>13</span></span>
</span>
For most fractions, the beginning is indicated with "start fraction", the horizontal line is indicated with "over", and the end of the fraction is indicated by "end fraction". For the semantic interpretation, most numeric fractions are spoken as they are in natural speech. Also if a number is followed by a numeric fraction, the word "and" is spoken in between.
If the numbers after the decimal terminate, yes, it's rational.
9.521521521 = 9,521,521,521 / 1,000,000,000
If they don't terminate, but the pattern continues (which I suspect is the case here), yes, it's still rational.
If <em>x</em> = 9.521521521…, then
1000<em>x</em> = 9521.521521521…
Subtract <em>x</em> from this to eliminate the fractional part:
1000<em>x</em> - <em>x</em> = 9521.521521521… - 9.521521521…
999<em>x</em> = 9512
<em>x</em> = 9512/999
If they don't terminate, but the pattern does <em>not</em> continue, meaning the next few digits could be something random like
9.521521521<u>19484929271283583457</u>…
then the number would be irrational.
<span>14+ 9 + 2+ 13+ 16+3+ 13+ 10 = 80
80/8 = 10
answer
mean = 10
</span>