Watch the news, research political candidates, and read more about global issues.
Dual consciousness is a contemporary example of which sociological concept developed at the turn of the twentieth century.
<h3>What does dual consciousness mean in sociology?</h3>
Dual consciousness is a situation in which an individual holds two contradictory sets of beliefs at the same time.
For example, the working-class may hold a set of beliefs derived from the education system that contrasts with a set of values acquired from the workplace.
<h3 /><h3>What are the three elements of double consciousness?</h3>
In this short but significant paragraph Du Bois poses three elements to the theory of Double Consciousness: the veil, twoness, and second sight.
Learn more about double consciousness here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/14864729</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer: c) Be flexible during new situations.
Explanation:
According to the mentioned situation in question, Hailey should persist flexibility in the in her future plans and situation so that she does not face stress and difficulty in handling the plans.If she stays stiff and constant for only prepared situations then it will create issues for her if the change in situation occurs.Thus, flexibility in future situations should present in Hailey.
Other options are incorrect because guest list , neglecting commitments and opting representatives for the responsibilities are not the correct steps for planning the future situation. These all factors are required along with flexibility characteristic as it will helps the most. Thus,the correct option is option (c).
Answer:
850 CE: the abbasid dynasty ruled as caliphs from their capital in baghdad in modern iraq after taking over authority of the muslim empire from the umayyads in 750 CE
good luck
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
