Answer:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Explanation:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense can be calculated as follows:
Bad debt expense = (Percentage of accounts receivable not yet due it will not collect * Accounts receivable not yet due) + (Percentage of receivables up to 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables up to 30 days past due) + (Parentage of receivables of receivables greater than 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables greater than 30 days past due) - Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (credit) ……………………… (1)
Substituting the relevant values into equation (1), we have:
Bad debt expense = (7% * $7,500) + (20% + $2,300) + (46% * $2,000) - $400 = $3,345.20
Therefore, the appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Answer:
c.Payment of freight costs for goods shipped to a customer
Explanation:
In the inventory account management using the perpetual system, whenever there is an event that may result in a change in the carrying value of inventory, the quantity of the change is immediately determined and adjusting entries are posted.
Examples of such events include purchase of merchandise inventory, return of merchandise inventory to the supplier, .Payment of freight costs for goods received from a supplier (this forms part of the cost of inventory).
From the options given, the only entry that will not result in an adjustment to inventory is c.Payment of freight costs for goods shipped to a customer. This will form part of the selling and distribution cost under operating expenses.
Answer:
Path-Goal Leadership Theory
Explanation:
Path-Goal Leadership Theory -
This theory was given by Robert House , in the year 1971 .
It refers to the type of leadership theory , where the behavior of the leader depends on the performance , motivation and satisfaction of the other employees , is referred to as the path - goal leadership theory .
It is also referred to as path–goal theory of leader effectiveness .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is Path-Goal Leadership Theory .
The answer is A. Multitasking. For three reasons: <span>You’re less productive. It is scientifically proven that there is no such thing as multitasking. You're simply switching from one task to another. When your brain tries to switch it needs to rethink about what its doing which wastes time.
You sabotage your ability to do good work. Constantly switching from one thing to another means you can't focus on one specific thing. This often leads to mistakes which means you need to take extra time to fix it anyway.
You squelch your creative juices. In other words when you go back and forth from one thing to another you're preventing your thoughts from developing into other thoughts. Which could potentially prevent a brilliant idea.Stay safe. Focus!
</span>