Answer:
More money and enganment to whoever they're purchasing from.
Explanation:
Answer:
the Hawthorne effect
Explanation:
The Hawthorne Effect is the theory that states that people are more likely to modify their behavior because they are under study or evaluation and not as a result of response to stimuli.
Therefore, according to the given question, Pete Jazoni's output nearly doubled once it was selected for special attention by experts. This is an example of the Hawthorne effect.
Answer:
Chiefdoms
Explanation:
Kin based societies, headed by hereditary leaders or priests with the powers such as ceremonial and labor organization, land use supervision, and resource distribution are known as Chiefdoms
Chiefdoms are forms of hereditary political organization that is usually based on kinship, in which power is left in the hands of the most senior members of the royal family or selected ruling families. They also exercise economic powers of resource distribution.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
BET U DOIN THE ENGLISH FINAL TO IM STUCK ON THIS QUESTION
