Answer:
Chuck must be less than $260,000
Explanation:
The economic decision rule is: Do it if that marginal benefit exceeds the marginal cost and Since Chuck was unwilling to purchase the house at $260,000, we can deduce that the marginal benefit of purchasing the house must be less than $260,000 due to the fact that the seller turns down the offer but says she will sell the house for $260,000.
Answer: The correct answer is "(A) Debit Accounts Receivable and credit Cash for $560".
Explanation: The non-existent 560 must be adjusted in the cash account, and the 560 receivable must be added to the third party that issued the check in the "accounts receivable" account.
The entry would be:
--------------------------------- . ------------------------------------------
Accounts Receivable 560
Cash 560
--------------------------------- . --------------------------------------------
Answer:
expectations theory
Explanation:
Expectations theory is defined as the prediction of what short-term interest rates will amount to in future based on the current long-term interest rates on an investment.
The theory suggests or states that "an investor will earn the same amount of interest by investing in two consecutive one-year bond investments that in one two-year bond investment".
Simply put, the theory say that one can invest twice in a one year bond and still make the same interest rate as investing once in a two-year bond.
This theory helps investors to make profits faster and even higher through multiple investments on bonds.
Cheers.
Answer:
b. They benefit from an expanded opportunity set.
Explanation:
Recently, financial market have become highly integrated, which help investor to diversify their portfolios internationally.
International portfolio help the investor to focus on foreign market´s securities to invest, it add exposure of portfolio to the growing and developed market. As firm is going global to expand opportunity set, so that it can earn more benefit out of diversified market, similarly, investor are going global by diversifying their investment opportunity.
Answer:
a) DuPont analysis for Johnson International
2013: 0.059 x 2.11 x 1.75 = 0.2179 = 21.79%
2014: 0.058 x 2.18 x 1.75 = 0.2213 = 22.13%
2015: 0.049 x 2.34 x 1.85 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
b) DuPont analysis for industry averages
2013: 0.054 x 2.05 x 1.67 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
2014: 0.047 x 2.13 x 1.69 = 0.1692 = 16.92%
2015: 0.041 x 2.15 x 1.64 = 0.1446 = 14.46%
c) Johnson International's drivers follow the same tendency as the industry's average, e.g. net profit margin decreased in a similar manner, and total asset turnover increased also in a similar manner to the industry's average. The only driver that doesn't follow the industry's trend is financial leverage. While other companies in the same industry decreased their financial leverage, Johnson increased it. You should further analyze why this happened and what are the potential consequences.
Explanation:
The DuPont analysis is used to break down ROE into 3 different components and that way you can analyze whether a company's high ROE comes along with a high risk. The following formula is used to calculate ROE based on 3 different factors:
R
OE = net pro
fit margin x total assets turnover x financial leverage
