1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
3 years ago
9

Why is malice difficult to prove? i need this ASAP

Law
2 answers:
vova2212 [387]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.

Explanation:

Illusion [34]3 years ago
3 0
Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false. it is a little harder because public figures have more factors to prove. ... Private individuals need only establish that the publisher acted with "negligence." However, where public figures are concerned, the courts have found that there is a lessened interest in protecting the defamed subject's reputation.
You might be interested in
Describe the print patterns that would distinguish between the following:
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

e a person Washington uh

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following could be limitations to being able to use a precedent to decide a court case? (Select all that apply.)
Serjik [45]

Answer:

The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.

Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.

The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.

Explanation:

1, 5,4

8 0
2 years ago
As compared to the opportunist robber, the professional robber is more likely to be older and have a prior arrest record.
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

B false

Explanation:

because if it was a professional robbee he would not have been caught before or have a prior arrest record

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How can Congress check the President?
Phoenix [80]

mental you you are in the world You you

are biggest mental

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A defendant was convicted of aggravated assault. His attorney appealed the conviction, and the first verdict was overturned base
EastWind [94]
Yes. I don’t know much about this. But a retrial should be allowed, this is my opinion after reading this
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Powers specifically given to the states in the constitution are called
    5·2 answers
  • Why was it difficult or impossible for the government of the United States
    10·2 answers
  • In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, one should
    11·1 answer
  • By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly express
    10·1 answer
  • Evidence that is in view of the police does not require a search warrant, but can be legally seized is called _______ ________ _
    7·1 answer
  • Can a teacher Legally wake you up during class even, thought you completed the work and the teacher isn't teaching us something.
    6·2 answers
  • A non-moving pickup or sedan with two people can weigh about:​
    9·1 answer
  • The President and Congress both have control over war powers
    15·1 answer
  • Consider the following scenario: Joe Pretend is traveling from California to his home in Texas. While he is in the middle of Ari
    12·1 answer
  • What is the difference between declaration and statement?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!