Answer:
A.
B.
Explanation:
For #4 it A. for #5 its B.
Answer:
The powers of the Federal government
Explanation:
Answer:
One argument made against the act was that the act went against what the foundation of America was built off of: the Constitution. Treaties formally signed with the Natives regarding their right to possess their own land were neglected.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is:<span>It can be committed by a nation state or noncombatants through excessive force.
This definition could be considered as the definition of terrorism because If the action can be committed by a nation state or non-combatants, the action would be closer to a revolution or an invasion rather than an act of terrorism.
</span><span>
</span>