Explanation:
The portfolio weight of an asset is the total investment in that asset divided by the total portfolio value. First, we will find the portfolio value, which is:
Total value = 122($32) + 102($22) = $6,148
The portfolio weight for each stock is:
WeightA = 122($32) / $6,148 = .6350
WeightB = 102($22) / $6,148 = .3650
Answer:
$32,300
Explanation:
With regards to the above, the amount of total assets is the addition of current assets + Fixed assets.
= Accounts receivables + Cash + Truck equipment
= $7,000 + $7,300+ $8,000 + $10,000
= $32,300
Therefore ,
Total assets = $32,300
The aggregate demand curve shows a relationship between aggregate price level and demand at the given spending growth.
<h3>What is demand?</h3>
Demand is explained as the requirement of a certain product in the market, usually this demand is varied if the prices are changed and the demand also is impacted by the supply.
If the prices are high it is highly likely that the demand of that product will reduce if the product is not a necessity.
If the prices are lower the demand for the product will increase.
Learn more about demand and supply at brainly.com/question/27305760
#SPJ1
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
