Answer: Lysergic acid diethylamide (Acid)
Explanation: Lysergic acid diethylamide (Acid) is categorised as a hallucinogenic drug which is mainly used for recreation or religious purpose, it has about 8 to 12 hours duration of action time.
Effect of this drug often includes; increased body temperature as well as blood pressure, Hallucination (seeing, touching, hearing things that are not actually there), altered feelings, awareness and thought, dilated pupils, etc.
Jenn's strange behavior or actions might have been cause by a drug called Lysergic acid diethylamide (Acid) as she was seeing things that weren't actually there and was sweeting due to her increased body temperature and pressure as her heartbeat rate increased. She seemed disoriented and have a dilated pupils as she might be experiencing an altered awareness of her surrounding.
This symptoms best match that of a person who have taken or ingested Lysergic acid diethylamide (Acid).
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
Their are many reasons why economists study the perfect competition model but we will focus on the options given and it is certified that all of them are the reason for this. Because it is used as a benchmark to compare with other market structures etc.
Firms can enter and leave the market without any restrictions , therefore, there is free entry and exit into and out of the market.
A perfectly competitive firm is known to be a price taker because the pressure of competing firms forces them to accept the prevailing equilibrium price in the market. If a firm in a perfectly competitive market raises the price of its product by so much as a penny, it will lose all of its sales to competitors.
Answer: criticism and hurtful words
Explanation:As humans, we are easily affected by what people say. Word have power to make or Mar someone,. It has power to build and destroy. We should learn to use words because children especially takes words to heart, they believe in it and start shaping themselves or believing the negative or positive words spoken about them
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
