Why do you think the Industrial Revolution led to rapid growth of cities in the northeastern states?

History

1 answer:

Readme [11.4K]2 years ago

3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following

I think the Industrial Revolution led to the rapid growth of cities in the northeastern states because in this region were located the big factories and fabrics that introduced mass production as their form to produce goods.

Many people from the south. who lived in the rural areas of that region, decided to move to the larger cities of the northeast precisely to get a job in the fabrics. Many immigrants came to the United States to work in factories, They came from Europe and Asia. They went to New York or Chicago, and many other cities.

Of course, the population grew and these workers, as they were poor, they had to live in poor overcrowded spaces with no ventilation at all and where disease spread quickly and easily.

You might be interested in

What power does original jurisdiction give the courts

Korvikt [17]

Original jurisdiction is the power to hear a case for the first time. Whereas "appellate jurisdiction" is the power to review the decision made by a lower court which may or may not have had original jurisdiction.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe the four plans of statehood for Oklahoma. Which can you infer was the one that most favored Native Americans? Why?

slava [35]

The greatest impetus for Oklahoma statehood began after the Land Run of ... Before the passage of theOklahoma Enabling Act (1906), four statehood plans evolved. ... Indians in O.T. were held in trust by the federal government for twenty-one ... Indian leaders and whites in Indian Territory (I.T.) favored doublestatehood.The Territory of Oklahoma was an organized incorporated territory of the United States that ... Until this point, Native Americans had exclusively used the land. ... was one of the main supporters of the opening of Oklahoma to white settlement. .... due to the growing idea of statehood, which had originated in Indian Territory.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Could a citizens' militia possibly be effective against an attempt to install a dictator?

alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

Indeed, a citizen militia could be effective against the illegitimate attempt to install a dictatorship in the country through military force. In fact, one of the main limitations that the rulers in the United States have to fall back on authoritarian or dictatorial governments, in addition to the checks and balances system, is the constitutional right that American citizens have to own weapons, inserted in the Second Amendment. Thus, the rulers know that in the event of an illegitimate attempt to gain power, the American people could quickly organize in defense of democracy and civil liberties since they have the necessary elements to do so. That is why the organization of a citizen militia would be perfectly possible and effective in this situation.

5 0

2 years ago

Describe the differences between loose constructionists and strict constructionists.

muminat

Answer:

What is strict construction? Strict construction means that the Federal government has very limited powers. Loose construction means that the Constitution gives the Federal government broad powers to do what is necessary.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can someone help me answer these questions

max2010maxim [7]

1: He’s holding a sword

2:There is a ship
3:those are aliens. I think

8 0

2 years ago