<span>The answer is
Emotion-focused coping. This targets to decrease and manage the intensity of
the negative and distressing emotions that a traumatic situation has caused
rather than solving the problematic situation itself. These coping strategies therefore
help people feel better but don’t solve the source of our pain. This
coping frequently gets applied when the problem is uncontrolled like terminal
illness or sudden and they need to try to handle and accept the situation.</span>
That would be france and britain. It was a territorial war.
How are we going to do this for you and you do not have a book
Explanation:
Hamilton thought the federal government should have more power than the states. Hamilton accepted defined political powers for the states, but fervently defended the federal government's sovereignty from state encroachment.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
